Abramovich’s gamble set to backfire – for once.

It’s safe to say that Roman Abramovich isn’t exactly known for his patience. His trigger happy finger has been a constant source of amusement/disillusionment/exasperation (delete as appropriate)

However, for the most part, things have turned out well for him. He fired Jose Mourinho, and his immediate replacement Avram Grant took Chelsea to the last day of the title race, and within touching distance of the Champions League (more than what Mourinho managed in his last full season).

“Big Phil” Scolari was sacked halfway through the 2008/09 season, but his immediate replacement Guus Hiddink won the FA Cup. And of course most recently, Roberto Di Matteo became arguably the most legendary caretaker of all time – guiding the side to the FA Cup and their first ever Champions League.

So taking all this into account, you can’t blame Roman for feeling a tad smug. Almost every time he fires a manager, to the disapproval of many pundits, his chosen replacement ends up delivering a good degree of success. Instability and knee jerk reactions appear to be the route to success in this regime.

However, with the appointment of Rafa Benitez, this may be one of those occasions where Chelsea’s owner regrets his managerial merry-go round. Not only is his interim boss somewhat of a hate figure for many Chelsea fans, but he’s not been given the key luxury which was afforded to the likes of Grant, Hiddink and Di Matteo – an experienced, powerful Chelsea side.

Maybe not this time: Abramovich may be regretting his approach. All rights to this image are reserved by Rex and The Telegraph.

Maybe not this time: Abramovich may be regretting his approach. All rights to this image belong to Rex and The Telegraph.

Although a manager is undoubtedly important, at Stamford Bridge it sometimes feels as if the players are more important, and the success is almost solely based on their abilities and mindset.

Grant may not have been the most able or popular coach, but he was blessed with a Chelsea side bang in their prime. Cech, Terry, Lampard, Essien, Ballack, Drogba and the 2 Coles all in their peak years. Makelele still around. He was an average coach in charge of a formidable squad.

Hiddink, who took over less than a year later, had largely the same group of players, whilst Di Matteo was able to eke out the final drops from the veterans. Out went the AVB introductions such as Romeu and Sturridge, in came the likes of Lampard, Mikel, Drogba and even Kalou.

Benitez however doesn’t have this benefit. Drogba, for so many years the symbol of the Chelsea side, has departed, while the three English veterans are not the players they once were (credit to Lampard for a decent renaissance though). They’ve also had absences from the side due to injuries and suspensions. In other words, unlike the other managers who’ve stepped in when Abramovich has fired someone, Benitez can’t rely on going back to the tried and trusted methods. He has a team in transition.

Rocky Rafa: Benitez hasn't had the best of starts.

Rocky Rafa: Benitez hasn’t had the best of starts. All rights to this image belong to Getty Images.

The likelihood of Chelsea challenging for the Premier League is slim to say the least – the gap between them and Manchester United has increased by 7 points since he arrived. They suffered a surprise League Cup exit to Swansea last week, while they will need a replay against Brentford to progress in the FA Cup.

The Blues will still finish in the top 4 and may manage a good FA Cup run, especially with Benitez’s record in knockout football. But they probably could have got that with Di Matteo at the helm (for the record, this writer believes that giving Di Matteo the permanent job in the first place was a bad decision – doing well as a caretaker is no guarantee of permanent success. Just ask Kenny Dalglish…)

There is no question that Abramovich would have been hoping for a similar level of success to his other short-term appointments. By the time the season ends, he may have to admit that the big pay-out given to Di Matteo, as well as the dissent amongst the Chelsea fans, could all have been avoided.

Advertisements

Potential PR disaster brewing for Manchester United

There are times when people marvel at Sir Alex Ferguson’s ability to keep up with modern football. His managerial career spans almost four decades, during which time the game has undergone radical changes both on and off the pitch.

At Manchester United’s end of season awards ceremony in May, he described himself as “a dinosaur”. This hasn’t stopped him from racking up countless trophies over the years, nor has it stopped him from dealing with many tricky off pitch situations.

Yet there are times – not too many it must be said – where it becomes obvious he is a man from a different era. His criticism of defender Rio Ferdinand over his refusal to wear the Kick It Out T-shirt before the game against Stoke City provides one such example. Ferguson, renowned for very rarely criticising his own players, said Ferdinand had let the club down and would be “dealt with” (a phrase which can sound menacing enough from most managers, let alone from the game’s biggest disciplinarian). He also stated that he had been left embarrassed by Ferdinand’s actions, having told journalists on Friday that everybody should and would be wearing the T-shirts prior to the game.

With all due respect to Sir Alex, this really isn’t about him. Rio’s brother Anton was the victim of racial abuse in one of football’s highest profile sagas. The family suffered an immense strain, including Anton being sent bullets and death threats. Rio’s international career effectively came to an end over the situation (despite Roy Hodgson’s claims to the contrary), while the perpetrator John Terry received a mere four match ban, with a £220,000 fine on top.

Making a stand: Ferdinand’s decision to not wear an anti-racism T-shirt angered his manager. All rights to this photo are reserved by Getty Images.

If Ferdinand feels that Kick it Out are not doing enough to stamp out racism, he is under no obligation to wear a T-shirt with their message on it (incidentally, as Gary Lineker pointed out on Match Of The Day, not wearing it actually creates more awareness of the issue). As much as Sir Alex likes to have the final word over what his players do, his attempt to punish Ferdinand will be seen as crass and damaging. His comments about Reading striker Jason Roberts, who led the calls for the boycott, were greeted with much dismay. In particular, his opinion that “there shouldn’t be sheep wandering off” smacked of someone who may have meant well but went about things in the wrong way. Does he think that players should be like sheep and blindly follow the crowd? Should they not be allowed to have their own opinions, particularly if they are in the group of players who are most affected by the issue of racism?

A couple of other things to note. Firstly, Ferdinand was not the only player to boycott the T-shirts. Aside from his brother Anton and Roberts, Manchester City duo Micah Richards and Joleon Lescott took the same option – Lescott has been doing so since 2007, after witnessing Newcastle player Emre allegedly racially abuse his former Everton colleague Joseph Yobo and receive no FA punishment. Another Reading player, Gareth McCleary, Stoke’s Kenwyne Jones, QPR’s Shaun Wright-Phillips and Junior Hoilett, and Everton’s Sylvain Distin and Victor Anichebe were also seen without the T-shirts. The key thing to note is that NONE of these players had to suffer the indignity of their managers publicly rebuking them for it. Stoke manager Tony Pulis stated that players had “the right to say yes or no”, whilst Reading’s Brian McDermott said he respected the views of his players and gave them his “100%” backing.

Secondly, and something that many people seem to have forgotten, is that there are United players past and present with previous for this. Back in 2005, when a Stand Up Speak Out anti-racism campaign had been launched, Gary Neville, Paul Scholes, Roy Carroll and Roy Keane refused to wear the tracksuits (Neville had earlier spoken about Nike cheapening the campaign by looking for a commercial advantage). For some reason, I can’t recall there being a similar backlash.

Much as Kenny Dalglish received huge criticism for his public behaviour during the Luis Suarez affair, Ferguson will receive the same bad press, and rightly so. While Dalglish was misguidedly trying to defend his own player, Ferguson has done the exact opposite, creating an image of potential disharmony in the camp. Some years ago, he featured in a documentary. One part of it can be seen on the following link . If you fast forward to 4.15, you will see him talking about his first manager at Rangers – Scot Symon, somebody Ferguson had huge respect for. Ferguson then goes on to say that there was one thing he took from him above anything else…..the art of never criticising his players in public.

Wayne Rooney’s Injury: Temporary Pain Relief for Sir Alex’s Headache?

It goes without saying that the loss of one of your star players, a man who scored 35 goals last season and is currently the club’s 4th highest goalscorer of all time, should be a cause rather than a cure for managerial headache. But when Sir Alex Ferguson analyses the situation, he may feel differently.

It was already well documented before Manchester United’s 3-2 win over Fulham on Saturday, that Wayne Rooney’s opening game performance at Everton was disappointing (although the same could be said for many of his team mates). Indeed, his manager’s decision to bench him for the Cottagers’ visit was seen by many as a necessary kick up the backside. For a long time, Rooney seemed to have near undroppable status. Bouts of poor form and even on pitch strops at team mates, which seem to have surfaced in the last 2 years, went without significant punishment. Now, this may not be the case.

Things to ponder? Wayne Rooney is stretchered off against Fulham. All rights to this image are reserved by Andrew Yates/AFP/Getty Images.

Rooney’s two preferred positions are as the Number 9 or the Number 10. Goalscorer or playmaker. The reason for his undroppable status was that he was by far the best option in either position. Summer acquisitions have changed this. Robin Van Persie, the only player in the Premier League to score more than Rooney last season, is at the very least his equal as a Number 9. Shinji Kagawa, last season’s Bundesliga Player Of The Year, offers a far more fluid and skilful option as a Number 10. Both have had excellent starts to their United careers and this is the reason for Sir Alex’s headache.

It seems folly to change a winning and attractive combination, but so is leaving out a player of Rooney’s calibre and experience. He could of course be moved into a wide forward position (i.e. David Villa), but United have a plethora of wing options already. Increased competition is a good thing, but it depends on how well the resources can be handled (particularly when one of them happens to be an A-lister). The emergence of Javier Hernandez in 2010/11 would surely have motivated Dimitar Berbatov, but it didn’t make a blind bit of difference as the Mexican’s form and ability to increase his team’s cohesion meant he regularly kept his place. Hernandez then went through the same thing himself last year due to the emergence of Danny Welbeck. Generally speaking, there will always be 2 forwards who play the bulk of the games. People like to point out that the Treble winning side of 1999 had 4 forwards who didn’t mind rotation (although there was still a clear first choice of Yorke and Cole) but that was a very different situation. Teddy Sheringham was 33, whilst Ole Gunnar Solskjaer had the rare personality of somebody who was happy to play Supersub despite his considerable talent. You wouldn’t say that about Rooney, Van Persie or Kagawa would you?

Flying start for the Dutchman: Van Persie opens his United account.

Some United fans have bemoaned the loss of the raging bull Rooney, who could turn a match in an instant and terrorise opposing defences with pace, power and skill. He seems to have gone from somebody who drew comparisons with Gazza and George Best, to somebody who’s “just” effective. I say that in inverted commas because we shouldn’t devalue what he currently is. He’s become one of the world’s top centre forwards. His goal record over the last 2 years for United stands at an extremely impressive 51 in 86, and the majority of managers in the game would snap him up in an instant if they could. However, there is the nagging sense of regret that he could, and maybe still can be, so much more. Whilst his finishing has improved immensely, his all round game has deteriorated over the last year. How often does somebody score 35 goals and still not get voted as his club’s player of the season? That says as much about him as it does for the actual winner, with all due respect to the brilliant Antonio Valencia.

Rooney’s nasty looking gash is expected to keep him out for around a month, which is undoubtedly robbing both club and country of a world-class option. But had he not suffered the injury, that may have been all he was at Old Trafford for a while – an option. His lay-off temporarily eases the selection dilemna for his manager. Of course, loss of form/injuries to other players are all perfectly likely, which means he could get back in the team and keep himself there with good performances. However, should Van Persie and Kagawa continue to flourish in his absence, his return will bring back this unfamiliar headache for his manager.